studentJD

LinkShare_234x60

Students Helping Students

Currently Briefing & Updating

Student Case Briefs, Outlines, Notes and Sample Tests Terms & Conditions
© 2010 No content replication for monetary use of any kind is allowed without express written permission
Back To Torts Briefs
   

Buitrago v. Rohr, 672 So. 2d 646

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1996

 

Chapter

13

Title

Vicarious Liability

Page

538

Topic

Employer-Employee Relationship

Quick Notes

10 Rules for determining an independent contractor 

 

Issue

o         Whether an employer is liable for the acts of an independent contractor?  No.

 

Procedure

Trial

o         Trial court granted Donovans motion for summary judgment, because Rohr was an independent contractor.

o         Plaintiff appeals

Appellant

o         Affirmed in favor of the Df - because he was an independent contractor.

 

Facts

Reason

Rules

o         Pl - Buitrago

o         Df -  Rohr

What happened?

o         Chuck Rohr hired by Blockbuster to put up hot air balloon.

o         He takes it down, drives home, and crashes into causes 1 death and 2 severe injuries.

o         Pl - named Donovan Entertainment as a Df on the theory that Rohr was acting as Donovans agent at the time of accident.

o         Trial court granted Donovans motion for summary judgment, because Rohr was an independent contractor.

o         Plaintiff appeals

Employee Status and the Restatement of Agency

 

General Rule

o        The principal who retains the independent contractor is not generally liable for the acts of the independent contractor as they are with an employee.

o        The principal that pays the independent contractor would not be liable for the tortious activities of an independent contractor.

 

 

Rule: 10 factor test for deter whether employ or independent contractor

1.       The extent of control which, by agree, the master may exercise over the details of the work (MOST SIGNIFICANT!!!)

o         The ability of control.  Does the principal retain the right to control.

2.       Whether the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business

3.       The kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in this locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or by a specialist w/o supervision.

4.       The skill required in the particular occupation

5.       Whether the employer or the workman supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place of work for the person doing the work

6.       The length of time for which the person is employed

7.       The method of payment, whether it is by time or job

o         Time would be an hourly wage.

o         Job paid by the job.

8.       Whether the work is part of regular business of employer

9.       Whether the parties believe they are creating the relation of master and servant

o         See if there is an employment contract.

10.   Whether the principal is or is not in business

o         If the principal is in business, then the person is more likely an employee.

 

The Pl does not have to satisfy all the requirements.  If reasonable people disagree then it will go to the jury.

 

First Factor

o         Donovan only told Rohr were the balloons should be displayed.

 

Second Factor

o         Rohr was incorporated and had numerous other clients.

o         Rohr was engaged in an entirely different business that Donovan.

 

Movant of Summary Judgment

o         Has the initial burden of demonstrating the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact.

o         Saves Donovan the expense of going through a trial.

 

Affirmed

 

Class Notes

General Rule

o        The principal who retains the independent contractor is not generally liable for the acts of the independent contractor as they are with an employee.

o        The principal that pays the independent contractor would not be liable for the tortious activities of an independent contractor.

 

The Control theory does not apply, because Blockbuster does not tell Rohr how to do the work.

 

Servant vs. Independent Contractor  Consideration

o        (a) the extent of control which, by the agreement, the master may exercise over the details of the work;

  • Exercising a lot of control (Employee); Exercising not much control (contractor)
  • MOST IMPORTANT!!!

 

o        (b) whether or not the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business;

  • If engaged in district occupation (contractor)

 

o        (c) the kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or by a specialist without supervision;

  • With Supervision (Employee); Without Supervision (Contractor)

 

o        (d) the skill required in the particular occupation;

  • A lot of skill (Contractor)

 

o        (e) whether the employer or the workman supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place of work for the person doing the work;

  • Employer Supplies (Employee); Contractor Supplies (Contractor). 

 

o        (f) the length of time for which the person is employed;

  • Long time (employee); -- Short time (Contractor)

 

o        (g) the method of payment, whether by the time or by the job;

  • Time (Employee); -- Job (Contractor)

 

o        (h) whether or not the work is a part of the regular business of the employer;

  • If part of the regular business (Employee).

 

o        (i) whether or not the parties believe they are creating the relation of master and servant; and

 

o        (j) whether the principal is or is not in business.

  • Is in type of business (employee); Not in type of business (contractor)